The shape obtained by the RECIPROC instrument enables effective irrigation and obturation with both cold and warm techniques. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. A comparison of canal preparations by Mtwo and RaCe rotary files using full sequence versus one rotary file techniques; a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. RRP. 04 Taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. 609-110-770

That means that one instrument only is required to prepare a root canal. PopUp = window.open( location,'RightsLink','location=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=650,height=550'); }, Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. The Reciproc instrument showed better resistance in the static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests (p < 0.05). For debris removal, Mtwo and Reciproc instruments achieved significantly better results (P < 0.05) than the other instruments in the apical third of the canals. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.



Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review--Part II: Properties and Effectiveness. Kuzekanani M, Walsh LJ, Yousefi MA.

R40 has a diameter of 0.40mm at the tip and a 6% taper over the first 3mm from the tip.

Int Endod J 2000;33:248-54.

2006 Mar;39(3):203-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01075.x. Aim:

The use of Mtwo and Reciproc instruments resulted in better canal cleanliness in the apical part compared with ProTaper and WaveOne.

Restor Dent Endod.  | 

Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:268-70. 2020 Jul;14(3):393-396. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710142. Third, the bigger apical taper of R25 Reciproc file compared to Mtwo file revealed wider canals where the curve is closer to the apex.
Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Dehghan S, Niasar AN, Kharazifard MJ.

Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of simulated root canals.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;20:340-9.

The effect of instrument and canal type on shaping ability were analyzed using two-way ANOVA test followed by post hoc Pearson Chi-square test and sum of squares test at level of significance 5%.Results: The largest mean canal width and transportation values were associated with the Mtwo system (P < 0.001) and 40°/8 mm canals (P < 0.001). Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement.



J Endod 1995;21:493-7. J Endod 1999;25:230-4. HHS R50 has a diameter of 0.50mm at the tip and a 5% taper over the first 3mm from the tip.

J Endod 2012;38:541-4. R50 prepares the root canal to a diameter of 0.50 mm with a taper of .05 over the first apical millimetres. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96. In the middle and coronal parts, no significant differences were obtained between Mtwo, Reciproc and WaveOne (P > 0.05), while ProTaper showed significantly more residual debris (P < 0.05). J Endod 1995;21:173-6. Plotino G, Ahmed HM, Grande NM, Cohen S, Bukiet F. J Endod.

De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN.

Keywords: Continuous rotation files, reciprocating files, shaping ability, time of instrumentation. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Comparison of cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time between Rotary and Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.

R40 prepares the root canal to a diameter of 0.40 mm with a taper of .06 over the first apical millimetres. Epub 2020 Feb 4. Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.

Methodology: Part 2.
Parashos P, Messer HH. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:798-800. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:807-13.

Shaping ability of ProFile.